[peruser] Status of peruser and other questions

stefan.klingner at mephisto23.com stefan.klingner at mephisto23.com
Wed Aug 26 21:38:25 MDT 2009

if we have a list with all patches, someone who knows how to do it should
create a new release, which we can use as a base for further development.
again i will ask, if someone is interested in a fork...:)

just one comment to the performance. i tested all variantions also
mentioned at stuarts blog and suphp is definitely slower than peruser. you
have to recheck your configuration.

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:09:18 +0100, Andrew <andyukguy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I've been looking into using peruser for some time now. However the  
> project itself isn't the easiest to get into for a newcomer:
> Judging from these lists the current consensus is that dc3 is the best  
> current implementation/extension of the peruser code base? Is this  
> correct? Is there a different branch that offers more?
> SSL support is now possible, but again I see it's best achieved with a  
> patch. Where can I get this patch? Is it maintained by anyone at a  
> particular site or is it best to just see what gets posted to the  
> mailing list?
> I think really I'm just looking for a summary of the current "best"  
> combination of patches to achieve a stable, fast and feature full  
> peruser. 0.3 + dc3 + SSL multi virtualhost patch is my best guess?
> Two more questions:
> - One process runs as root and passes requests to the multiplexer.  
> Does this not introduce the same problems that MPM-itk has with  
> potential full root security holes if say mod_ssl gets exploited?
> - What sort of performance should I be expecting to see from peruser?  
> I was lead to believe by
>   that peruser gave very similar performance to mod_php + prefork.  
> However my experience is very much different, ab (simplistic as it is)  
> running 100 or 1000 requests typically sees peruser being a lot slower  
> e.g. 1000 requests in 0.8s for mod_php + prefork but 7s for peruser. I  
> tried tweaking various settings but couldn't change the results in any  
> significant way. Perhaps this is typical performance and I shouldn't  
> be worried that I'm doing something wrong?
> Many thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> Peruser mailing list
> Peruser at telana.com
> http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser

More information about the Peruser mailing list