[peruser] Segfaults on peruser_post_read
Janno Sannik
janno at kood.ee
Wed May 14 23:53:09 MDT 2008
It's not strange, it's called work in progress :) Afterall peruser IS
experimental. But yes, it would be good idea to catch things like that.
infernix wrote:
> Taavi Sannik wrote:
>
>>> <snip>
>>> <IfModule per_user.c>
>>> ServerEnvironment benchma2 benchma2
>>> </IfModule>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>
>> You have a slight typo in the configuration:
>> It should be peruser.c (not per_user.c)
>>
>
> Doh! How silly.
>
> Isn't it a bit strange that this causes segfaults instead of a useful
> error, though?
>
> Anyway, thanks, it works now. We'll get started with the actual tests now :)
>
> Regards,
>
> infernix
> _______________________________________________
> Peruser mailing list
> Peruser at telana.com
> http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.telana.com/pipermail/peruser/attachments/20080515/f28b658e/attachment.html
More information about the Peruser
mailing list